-

Posted on May 24, 2013 via BruceS with 799 notes
Source: brucesterling
-
So I called Carl, and said, ‘Hey, I don’t know if you’ve seen the show but we wanna use you for it, and you’d be working with David Cross.’ And he goes, ‘Great, but let me ask you something. It’s not going to be just a bunch of Rocky jokes is it?’ I laughed, ‘No! No! Give me a little credit, Carl. Of course not! It’s a multidimensional character.’ And he was like, ‘Because I direct and I’m a funny guy and I don’t wanna just do a bunch of Rocky jokes. Nobody wants that. Maybe I could be really cheap or something?’ And I said, ‘Whaaaat?’ ‘Maybe I could be really cheap?’ ‘Really? You’d like to do that?’ ‘Oh, absolutely, that’s what I’m saying. I want to play someone funny, not just be a sight gag.’ It was so much better. I went back to the writers room and said, ‘You’re not going to believe this. Carl Weathers wants to be incredibly cheap.’ All credit to Carl on that.
Origin Stories of Six Arrested Development Jokes — Vulture
{Carl Weathers}
Posted on May 24, 2013 with 1 note
Source: vulture.com
-
5-Year-Old Wants To Be A Tractor When She Grows Up
-
[Color pic: a cluster of punks shielding their mohawks under one small umbrella]
Is it a cluster of punks? Is that the appropriate wording? It seems like it would be like a stink of punks or a shove or something.
An Oi! of punks.
A crust of punks!
Posted on April 23, 2013 via Do.It.Yourself with 1,144 notes
Source: do-it-yourself-
-
{Boston}
Source: Spotify
-
The University of Illinois has giant banners, about 20 or more feet in the air, hanging in Union Station to advertise their MBA program. One of them has a QR code for you to scan. You know, 20 feet up in the air.
*headdesk*
Which is worse, this, or the ridiculous Save the Chief billboards? I mean, I’d think perpetuating an embarrassing racist caricature in a ridiculous and spiteful lost-cause campaign would win hands down, but then I weigh that against 600,000 MBAs + egregious mis/over-use of QR codes, and it’s a pretty close thing.
(via oldtobegin)
Posted on April 11, 2013 via This is the glamorous. with 130 notes
Source: thisistheglamorous
-
Related Phenomena
-
Bitcoin is yet another lame attempt to claim that Society doesn’t exist
(Felix Salmon - The Bitcoin Bubble)
Such people, including Satoshi Nakamoto, are far from unique in their mistrust of all existing financial institutions. What sets Nakamoto apart is that he turned that mistrust into a philosophy, the most important driving force behind the bitcoin project. When he introduced bitcoin to the world in February 2009, Nakamoto boasted that his new currency was “completely decentralized, with no trusted parties”. And he explained in some detail what he saw as the problem in need of a solution:
The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that’s required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them not to let identity thieves drain our accounts.
There are all kinds of amusing ways in which you can poke fun at Bitcoin and the subculture that has grown up around it. But, taken seriously, this is yet another big bet by the privileged techno-libertarian class that those of us who believe in society and a commonwealth and democracy and all that rot are the dumb money in the room.
You don’t fix problems of trust by eliminating trust from the equation. You fix them socially, democratically, empathically. The answer to a failure of trust isn’t further atomization (neatly disguised as techno-utopian transcendence). It’s justice.
(Which, easier said than done, yeah. People mistrust our institutions because our institutions are profoundly broken. And there has been precious little justice or reckoning with the events of the past decade and more. But the answer sure as hell isn’t to run away and hide in the Singularity. Social problems have social solutions. Broken institutions have to be mended, and absent justice has to be created. Put your shoulder to the wheel. Start doing what the online community used to do best: inventing new systems of trust and new ways to connect.)
-
Another myth that is firmly upheld is that disabled people are dependent and non-disabled people are independent. No one is actually independent. This is a myth perpetuated by disablism and driven by capitalism - we are all actually interdependent. Chances are, disabled or not, you don’t grow all of your food. Chances are, you didn’t build the car, bike, wheelchair, subway, shoes, or bus that transports you. Chances are you didn’t construct your home. Chances are you didn’t sew your clothing (or make the fabric and thread used to sew it). The difference between the needs that many disabled people have and the needs of people who are not labelled as disabled is that non-disabled people have had their dependencies normalized. The world has been built to accommodate certain needs and call the people who need those things independent, while other needs are considered exceptional. Each of us relies on others every day. We all rely on one another for support, resources, and to meet our needs. We are all interdependent. This interdependence is not weakness; rather, it is a part of our humanity.
Posted on April 1, 2013 via dandyfied with 7,620 notes
Source: dandyfied
-
Okay, true life story time, the summer that holajupiter and I worked at summer camp together (like, when we were in college. This was only about seven years ago.), we were visiting a friend in St. Louis and saw that this museum was open all night, so we decided to go. I think we specifically wanted to go to the aquarium bit of it because our AAA guide said that it had a touch tank?
GUYS. THIS MUSEUM. Like. I need to go back again. Maybe in daylight. With a camera. Because some of the shit I remember about it CANNOT BE REAL. As summer camp counselors, we were constantly cognizant of children’s safety, but in that summer camp-y kind of way where you’re like, “Well, okay, you can climb on that log, but be careful.” You know, safe, but with a sort of loose knowledge that kids will be kids and you are at a place where they are encouraged to run around and have fun. That being said, THERE IS NO WAY THIS PLACE WAS UP TO CODE. We spent the whole night, despite our summer-camp-y-safety mindset, being horrified that a child was going to die in front of us.
Giant, open aquarium tanks with no attendants and, in one place, ladders and stairs that led right into the water! Exposed pipes and beams and nails! THERE WAS NO SUPERVISION ANYWHERE. It was seriously like a bad trip. I distinctly remember us going to the gift shop to try and look for some sort of post card or souvenir book that had some information on HOW ANY OF THIS WAS OKAY.
I just googled “How many kids have died at City Museum”
However many it is, it’s totally worth it.
Posted on March 26, 2013 via Hello, St. Louis with 19 notes
Source: hellosaintlouis
![livingluster:
leahstuff:
gorgonetta:
[Color pic: a cluster of punks shielding their mohawks under one small umbrella]
Is it a cluster of punks? Is that the appropriate wording? It seems like it would be like a stink of punks or a shove or something.
An Oi! of punks.
A crust of punks!](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m8lwwtcuAE1qbgm7so1_500.jpg)
